Designing the campaign as a coherent system: a realistic electoral target, priority audiences, a message, a timeline and a reasoned allocation of resources.
Candidates, campaign leadership teams and political parties, for local, legislative or national elections.
As early as possible before polling day; the strategy is then reviewed at every stage of the electoral cycle.
Strategic plan, map of territorial priorities, phased timeline and resource allocation plan.
Most campaigns lack neither energy nor goodwill; what they lack is a guiding line. Without an explicit strategy, resources are scattered, messages contradict each other from one area to the next, and decisions are taken at the pace of emergencies.
Political science approaches a campaign as a problem of allocation under constraint: limited time, finite means and a heterogeneous electorate whose dispositions — preferences, level of information, propensity to vote — vary widely. Every strategy arbitrates between two fundamental levers: the persuasion of undecided voters and the mobilisation of existing supporters.
Our role is to make these trade-offs objective: to set an electoral target grounded in explicit assumptions, identify credible pathways to reach it, and translate that choice into a plan the entire organisation can understand and execute.
Six workstreams structure the design of a campaign strategy.
Estimating, from previous elections and expected turnout, the number of votes required — expressed as a range rather than a certainty.
Distinguishing strongholds, battleground areas and unfavourable territories in order to direct effort where it has the greatest effect.
Determining, area by area, whether the priority is to win over new voters or to turn out those already committed.
Defining the core proposition of the candidacy and how it stands out within the existing political offer.
Sequencing the campaign into phases — launch, build-up, final mobilisation — each with its own objectives.
Allocating budget, the candidate’s time and teams in line with priorities, while preserving room for adjustment.
A campaign strategy is built in successive stages, each validated before moving to the next.
Electoral analysis, study of the competitive environment and audit of available resources.
Construction of alternative pathways and assessment of the conditions under which they can succeed.
Decision sessions with the candidate and campaign leadership to settle on a direction.
Translation into an action plan, timeline, budget and responsibilities.
Regular reviews testing the plan against field data and changing circumstances.
Every tool we use is documented: its sources, assumptions and limitations are known to our clients.
Close reading of previous elections, at the most granular level public data allows.
Estimating likely turnout by area in order to calibrate the vote target.
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, measured against the positioning of rival candidacies.
Building the timeline from polling day and statutory deadlines.
A small set of indicators shared by the whole campaign leadership.
Every indicator is labelled by status — target, calculated estimate or measured result — in line with our principles of rigour
| Indicator | What it shows | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Votes required | The threshold to be reached under the chosen turnout assumption. | Calculated estimate |
| Coverage of priority areas | The share of target areas actually covered by the campaign. | Measured result |
| Timeline milestones | The key stages the campaign has set itself. | Target |
| Planned vs committed budget | The financial sustainability of the plan. | Measured result |
Campaign strategy operates within limits we regard as non-negotiable.
Official calendar, financing, communication: the strategy is built within the legal framework, never around it.
We favour a contest of programmes. No strategy relies on disinformation or the denigration of individuals.
Targets are presented with their assumptions. An uncomfortable finding is worth more than a reassuring illusion.
No strategy seeks to inflame community, religious or regional tensions.
Strategy is, above all, the art of deciding what not to do.AXIOME working principle
Illustrative situations: they do not describe actual engagements.
A little-known candidate needs to build name recognition and identify the areas where their profile resonates.
An elected official must defend a record while renewing their offer in the face of changing expectations.
A party must reconcile qualifying in the first round with the ability to build a broader coalition in the second.
As early as possible: an early strategy leaves time to build name recognition, structure the organisation and test messages. It remains useful at any point, including to redirect a campaign already under way.
No. It sets a course and priorities, but it is reviewed regularly in light of field data, shifts in public opinion and unforeseen events.
The candidate and their campaign leadership. We clarify the options, their conditions and their risks; the political decision is theirs.
Every political context is unique. A first, strictly confidential conversation allows us to understand what is at stake and define the most relevant support.