Building a coherent and lasting political identity — values, personality, visual and verbal identity — that makes a candidacy or party recognisable and credible.
Candidates, parties, movements and political platforms being created or renewed.
Ideally outside intensive election periods; at a launch, relaunch or repositioning.
Brand platform, visual and verbal identity, graphic charter, usage guide.
Voters do not read programmes in full. They form an overall picture of a candidate or party from a set of signals: stated values, behaviour, consistency of positions, communication style, visual identity. This picture, which political communication scholars describe as a political brand, acts as a cognitive shortcut in the voting decision.
A strong political brand rests on authenticity: it cannot be artificially bolted on without soon being exposed. It is built from the real identity of the candidate or movement, its history and commitments, and is then expressed consistently across every medium.
Our work consists of revealing, formalising and embodying this identity, so that it becomes a stable reference point over time, beyond a single election.
A complete approach, from the substance of the brand to its concrete expressions.
Analysis of current perceptions among key audiences and the gaps with the desired image.
Formalising the mission, values, personality and political promise.
Logo, colours, typefaces and graphic universe, designed for legibility and recognition.
The tone, style, signature and vocabulary specific to the brand.
Consistency between the brand and the candidate’s public posture, appearance and behaviour.
Rules ensuring consistency across all media and areas.
A credible political brand is rooted in the real identity of those who carry it.
Interviews, historical analysis and image audit.
Workshops to formalise values, personality and promise.
Designing visual and verbal identities, tested with audiences.
Charter, usage guide and support for team adoption.
Every tool we use is documented: its sources, assumptions and limitations are known to our clients.
Qualitative studies and media analysis measuring perceived image.
Structured working sessions with the candidate and their close circle.
Assessing understanding and recall of visual elements, including on simple printed materials.
Regular review of materials against the usage guide.
Every indicator is labelled by status — target, calculated estimate or measured result — in line with our principles of rigour
| Indicator | What it shows | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Brand recognition | The ability of audiences to identify the candidacy from its distinctive signs. | Measured result |
| Associated attributes | The qualities voters spontaneously associate with the candidacy. | Calculated estimate |
| Perceived vs desired image gap | The distance to close between perception and intention. | Target |
| Material compliance | The share of materials produced that follow the charter. | Measured result |
A manufactured political identity always ends up colliding with reality; we do not build them.
We formalise a real identity, without inventing a career path or qualities that do not exist.
No identity borrows the distinctive signs of institutions, the State or other parties.
Identities are designed to be legible by all, including on modest materials.
We favour choices that can serve the party beyond a single election.
A political brand is only credible if it resembles those who carry it.AXIOME working principle
Illustrative situations: they do not describe actual engagements.
A new party needs a clear identity from the moment it is founded.
An established party wants to modernise its image without disowning its history.
A leader from civil society is entering politics and must build legitimacy.
No. The logo is only one expression of it. The brand encompasses values, personality, tone and the consistency of public behaviour.
Identity elements can be designed in a few weeks, but recognition is built over time, through the consistent repetition of signs and behaviour.
No. A stable identity accumulates recognition. Campaigns can adapt it without calling it into question.
Every political context is unique. A first, strictly confidential conversation allows us to understand what is at stake and define the most relevant support.